Re: [PATCH 0/2] Input: tests - miscellaneous fixes

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Javier,

On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 12:17 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch series fixes a crash in the new input selftest, and makes the
> test available when the KUnit framework is modular.
>
> Unfortunately test 3 still fails for me (tested on Koelsch (R-Car M2-W)
> and ARAnyM):
>
>         KTAP version 1
>         # Subtest: input_core
>         1..3
>     input: Test input device as /devices/virtual/input/input1
>         ok 1 input_test_polling
>     input: Test input device as /devices/virtual/input/input2
>         ok 2 input_test_timestamp
>     input: Test input device as /devices/virtual/input/input3
>         # input_test_match_device_id: ASSERTION FAILED at # drivers/input/tests/input_test.c:99
>         Expected input_match_device_id(input_dev, &id) to be true, but is false
>         not ok 3 input_test_match_device_id
>     # input_core: pass:2 fail:1 skip:0 total:3
>     # Totals: pass:2 fail:1 skip:0 total:3
>     not ok 1 input_core

Adding more debug code shows that it's the test on evbit [1] in
input_match_device_id() that fails.
Looking at your input_test_match_device_id(), I think you expect
the checks for the various bitmaps to be gated by
"if (id->flags & INPUT_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_EVBIT)", like is done for the
other checks?

[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/input/input.c#L1021

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds