Re: [PATCH v2] usb: typec: tcpm: fix multiple times discover svids error

From: Greg KH
Date: Thu Apr 20 2023 - 04:09:18 EST


On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 01:27:13PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 04:11:49PM +0800, Frank Wang wrote:
> > PD3.0 Spec 6.4.4.3.2 say that only Responder supports 12 or more SVIDs,
> > the Discover SVIDs Command Shall be executed multiple times until a
> > Discover SVIDs VDO is returned ending either with a SVID value of
> > 0x0000 in the last part of the last VDO or with a VDO containing two
> > SVIDs with values of 0x0000.
> >
> > In the current implementation, if the last VDO does not find that the
> > Discover SVIDs Command would be executed multiple times even if the
> > Responder SVIDs are less than 12, and we found some odd dockers just
> > meet this case. So fix it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Wang <frank.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > index 66de02a56f512..a3ae2c79f3540 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > @@ -1515,7 +1515,21 @@ static bool svdm_consume_svids(struct tcpm_port *port, const u32 *p, int cnt)
> > pmdata->svids[pmdata->nsvids++] = svid;
> > tcpm_log(port, "SVID %d: 0x%x", pmdata->nsvids, svid);
> > }
> > - return true;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * PD3.0 Spec 6.4.4.3.2: The SVIDs are returned 2 per VDO (see Table
> > + * 6-43), and can be returned maximum 6 VDOs per response (see Figure
> > + * 6-19). If the Respondersupports 12 or more SVID then the Discover
> > + * SVIDs Command Shall be executed multiple times until a Discover
> > + * SVIDs VDO is returned ending either with a SVID value of 0x0000 in
> > + * the last part of the last VDO or with a VDO containing two SVIDs
> > + * with values of 0x0000.
> > + *
> > + * However, some odd dockers support SVIDs less than 12 but without
> > + * 0x0000 in the last VDO, so we need to break the Discover SVIDs
> > + * request and return false here.
> > + */
> > + return cnt == 7;
> > abort:
> > tcpm_log(port, "SVID_DISCOVERY_MAX(%d) too low!", SVID_DISCOVERY_MAX);
> > return false;
>
> This is OK by men, but let's wait for Guenter.

What ever happened to this patch?

thanks,

greg k-h