Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: Replace BPF_ALU and BPF_JMP with BPF_ALU32 and BPF_JMP64

[Tiezhu Yang]

On 02/02/2023 07:26 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 4:36 AM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The intention of this patchset is to make the code more readable,
> > no functional changes, based on bpf-next.
> >
> > If this patchset makes no sense, please ignore it and sorry for that.
> ...
> >  157 files changed, 4299 insertions(+), 4295 deletions(-)
>
> Are you trying to get to the top of lwn's "most active developers by
> lines changed" ?

Oh, no, no intention of doing so.

> I'm sure you knew that it's most likely going to be rejected,
> yet you still sent it. why?

Sorry for the trouble.
Maybe just send patch #1 and #4 as RFC is a proper way.

> Your developer's reputation suffers.
> Think quality and not quantity.

Anyway, thank you for your reply.