Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: Replace BPF_ALU and BPF_JMP with BPF_ALU32 and BPF_JMP64

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 4:36 AM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The intention of this patchset is to make the code more readable,
> no functional changes, based on bpf-next.
>
> If this patchset makes no sense, please ignore it and sorry for that.
...
>  157 files changed, 4299 insertions(+), 4295 deletions(-)

Are you trying to get to the top of lwn's "most active developers by
lines changed" ?
I'm sure you knew that it's most likely going to be rejected,
yet you still sent it. why?
Your developer's reputation suffers.
Think quality and not quantity.