Re: [RFC v3 3/4] mm, printk: introduce new format %pGt for page_type

[Petr Mladek]

On Sun 2022-12-18 19:19:00, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> %pGp format is used to print 'flags' field of struct page.
> As some page flags (e.g. PG_buddy, see page-flags.h for more details)
> are set in page_type field, introduce %pGt format which provides
> human readable output of page_type.
> 
> Note that the sense of bits are different in page_type. if page_type is
> 0xffffffff, no flags are set. if PG_slab (0x00100000) flag is set,
> page_type is 0xffefffff. Clearing a bit means we set the bit.
> 
> Bits in page_type are inverted when printing page type names.
> 
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst
> @@ -575,12 +575,13 @@ The field width is passed by value, the bitmap is passed by reference.
>  Helper macros cpumask_pr_args() and nodemask_pr_args() are available to ease
>  printing cpumask and nodemask.
>  
> -Flags bitfields such as page flags, gfp_flags
> +Flags bitfields such as page flags, page_type, gfp_flags
>  ---------------------------------------------

Please, underline the entire title. Otherwise, "make htmldoc"
complains ;-)

    /prace/kernel/linux/Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst:579: WARNING: Title underline too short.
    Flags bitfields such as page flags, page_type, gfp_flags


>  
>  ::
>  
>  	%pGp	0x17ffffc0002036(referenced|uptodate|lru|active|private|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
> +	%pGt	0xffefffff(slab)
>  	%pGg	GFP_USER|GFP_DMA32|GFP_NOWARN
>  	%pGv	read|exec|mayread|maywrite|mayexec|denywrite
>  

Please, explain this also in the paragraph below these examples.
I would personally refactor it to an itemized list, something like:

<proposal>
For printing flags bitfields as a collection of symbolic constants that
would construct the value. The type of flags is given by the third
character. Currently supported are:

	- p - [p]age flags, expects value of type (``unsigned long *``)
	- t - page [t]ype, expects value of type (``unsigned int *``)
	- v - [v]ma_flags, expects value of type (``unsigned long *``)
	- g - [g]fp_flags, expects value of type (``gfp_t *``)

The flag names and print order depends on the particular type.
</proposal>

Rant:
Sigh, it looks a bit error prone when similar pointer modifiers
expects pointers to different types. I wish there was a way how
to check the passed pointer type at compilation time. But it
is generic problem with these %p* modifiers.


Otherwise the patch looks fine for the vsprinf side.

Best Regards,
Petr