Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Fixed a typo in atomic_t.txt

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Tue Nov 29 2022 - 13:46:07 EST


On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 06:50:59PM +0530, Kushagra Verma wrote:
> Fixed a typo in the word 'architecture'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kushagra Verma <kushagra765@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Good eyes! Queued for further review, thank you!

Thanx, Paul

> ---
> Documentation/atomic_t.txt | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> index 0f1ffa03db09..d7adc6d543db 100644
> --- a/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ atomic operations.
>
> Specifically 'simple' cmpxchg() loops are expected to not starve one another
> indefinitely. However, this is not evident on LL/SC architectures, because
> -while an LL/SC architecure 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
> +while an LL/SC architecture 'can/should/must' provide forward progress
> guarantees between competing LL/SC sections, such a guarantee does not
> transfer to cmpxchg() implemented using LL/SC. Consider:
>
> --
> 2.38.1
>