Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igbvf: Regard vf reset nack as success

[Paul Menzel]

Dear Akihiko,


Thank you for your patch.


Am 22.11.22 um 10:27 schrieb Akihiko Odaki:
> vf reset nack actually represents the reset operation itself is
> performed but no address is not assigned. Therefore, e1000_reset_hw_vf

Is … no … not assigned … intentional?

> should fill the "perm_addr" with the zero address and return success on
> such an occassion. This prevents its callers in netdev.c from saying PF

occasion

> still resetting, and instead allows them to correctly report that no
> address is assigned.

In what environment do you hit the problem?

[…]


Kind regards,

Paul