Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_chtwc: Use dev_err_probe()

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 6/16/22 19:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Simplify the mux error path a bit by using dev_err_probe().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, patch looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>

Regards,

Hans


> ---
>  drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_chtwc.c | 19 +++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_chtwc.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_chtwc.c
> index 4eab191e053a..1cbe2bcce530 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_chtwc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_chtwc.c
> @@ -179,18 +179,13 @@ static int cht_wc_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(ACPI_HANDLE(dev), "_HRV", NULL, &hrv);
> -	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PMIC hardware revision\n");
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -	}
> -	if (hrv != CHT_WC_HRV) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "Invalid PMIC hardware revision: %llu\n", hrv);
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -	}
> -	if (client->irq < 0) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "Invalid IRQ\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "Failed to get PMIC hardware revision\n");
> +	if (hrv != CHT_WC_HRV)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "Invalid PMIC hardware revision: %llu\n", hrv);
> +
> +	if (client->irq < 0)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Invalid IRQ\n");
>  
>  	pmic = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pmic), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!pmic)