Re: [PATCH 23/23] KVM: MMU: replace direct_map with mmu_role.direct

From: David Matlack
Date: Mon Feb 07 2022 - 20:06:00 EST

Next message: Chun-Kuang Hu: "Re: [PATCH v15 04/12] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: dsc: add yaml for mt8195 SoC binding"
Previous message: David Matlack: "Re: [PATCH 22/23] KVM: MMU: use cpu_role for root_level"
In reply to: Paolo Bonzini: "[PATCH 23/23] KVM: MMU: replace direct_map with mmu_role.direct"
Next in thread: David Matlack: "Re: [PATCH 00/23] KVM: MMU: MMU role refactoring"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 06:57:18AM -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> direct_map is always equal to the role's direct field:
>
> - for shadow paging, direct_map is true if CR0.PG=0 and mmu_role.direct is
> copied from cpu_role.base.direct
>
> - for TDP, it is always true and mmu_role.direct is also always true
>
> - for shadow EPT, it is always false and mmu_role.direct is also always
> false
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 -
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 30 ++++++++++++++----------------
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 12 ++++++------
> 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index c86a2beee92a..647b3f6d02d0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -432,7 +432,6 @@ struct kvm_mmu {
> gpa_t root_pgd;
> union kvm_mmu_role cpu_role;
> union kvm_mmu_page_role mmu_role;
> - bool direct_map;
> struct kvm_mmu_root_info prev_roots[KVM_MMU_NUM_PREV_ROOTS];
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 5a6541d6a424..ce55fad99671 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -2045,7 +2045,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> int direct,
> unsigned int access)
> {
> - bool direct_mmu = vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map;
> + bool direct_mmu = vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.direct;
> union kvm_mmu_page_role role;
> struct hlist_head *sp_list;
> unsigned quadrant;
> @@ -2147,7 +2147,7 @@ static void shadow_walk_init_using_root(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterato
>
> if (iterator->level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL &&
> vcpu->arch.mmu->cpu_role.base.level < PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL &&
> - !vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map)
> + !vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.direct)
> iterator->level = PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL;
>
> if (iterator->level == PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL) {
> @@ -2523,7 +2523,7 @@ static int kvm_mmu_unprotect_page_virt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
> gpa_t gpa;
> int r;
>
> - if (vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map)
> + if (vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.direct)
> return 0;
>
> gpa = kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_read(vcpu, gva, NULL);
> @@ -3255,7 +3255,8 @@ void kvm_mmu_free_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu,
>
> if (free_active_root) {
> if (mmu->mmu_role.level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL &&
> - (mmu->cpu_role.base.level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL || mmu->direct_map)) {
> + (mmu->cpu_role.base.level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL ||
> + mmu->mmu_role.direct)) {
> mmu_free_root_page(kvm, &mmu->root_hpa, &invalid_list);
> } else if (mmu->pae_root) {
> for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
> @@ -3558,7 +3559,8 @@ static int mmu_alloc_special_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * equivalent level in the guest's NPT to shadow. Allocate the tables
> * on demand, as running a 32-bit L1 VMM on 64-bit KVM is very rare.
> */
> - if (mmu->direct_map || mmu->cpu_role.base.level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL ||
> + if (mmu->mmu_role.direct ||
> + mmu->cpu_role.base.level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL ||
> mmu->mmu_role.level < PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -3647,7 +3649,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_sync_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> int i;
> struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
>
> - if (vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map)
> + if (vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.direct)
> return;
>
> if (!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
> @@ -3872,7 +3874,7 @@ static bool kvm_arch_setup_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
>
> arch.token = (vcpu->arch.apf.id++ << 12) | vcpu->vcpu_id;
> arch.gfn = gfn;
> - arch.direct_map = vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map;
> + arch.direct_map = vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.direct;
> arch.cr3 = vcpu->arch.mmu->get_guest_pgd(vcpu);
>
> return kvm_setup_async_pf(vcpu, cr2_or_gpa,
> @@ -4090,7 +4092,6 @@ static void nonpaging_init_context(struct kvm_mmu *context)
> context->gva_to_gpa = nonpaging_gva_to_gpa;
> context->sync_page = nonpaging_sync_page;
> context->invlpg = NULL;
> - context->direct_map = true;
> }
>
> static inline bool is_root_usable(struct kvm_mmu_root_info *root, gpa_t pgd,
> @@ -4641,7 +4642,6 @@ static void paging64_init_context(struct kvm_mmu *context)
> context->gva_to_gpa = paging64_gva_to_gpa;
> context->sync_page = paging64_sync_page;
> context->invlpg = paging64_invlpg;
> - context->direct_map = false;
> }
>
> static void paging32_init_context(struct kvm_mmu *context)
> @@ -4650,7 +4650,6 @@ static void paging32_init_context(struct kvm_mmu *context)
> context->gva_to_gpa = paging32_gva_to_gpa;
> context->sync_page = paging32_sync_page;
> context->invlpg = paging32_invlpg;
> - context->direct_map = false;
> }
>
> static union kvm_mmu_role
> @@ -4735,7 +4734,6 @@ static void init_kvm_tdp_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, union kvm_mmu_role cpu_role)
> context->page_fault = kvm_tdp_page_fault;
> context->sync_page = nonpaging_sync_page;
> context->invlpg = NULL;
> - context->direct_map = true;
> context->get_guest_pgd = get_cr3;
> context->get_pdptr = kvm_pdptr_read;
> context->inject_page_fault = kvm_inject_page_fault;
> @@ -4852,7 +4850,7 @@ void kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool execonly,
> context->gva_to_gpa = ept_gva_to_gpa;
> context->sync_page = ept_sync_page;
> context->invlpg = ept_invlpg;
> - context->direct_map = false;
> +
> update_permission_bitmask(context, true);
> context->pkru_mask = 0;
> reset_rsvds_bits_mask_ept(vcpu, context, execonly, huge_page_level);
> @@ -4967,13 +4965,13 @@ int kvm_mmu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> int r;
>
> - r = mmu_topup_memory_caches(vcpu, !vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map);
> + r = mmu_topup_memory_caches(vcpu, !vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.direct);
> if (r)
> goto out;
> r = mmu_alloc_special_roots(vcpu);
> if (r)
> goto out;
> - if (vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map)
> + if (vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.direct)
> r = mmu_alloc_direct_roots(vcpu);
> else
> r = mmu_alloc_shadow_roots(vcpu);
> @@ -5176,7 +5174,7 @@ int kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa, u64 error_code,
> void *insn, int insn_len)
> {
> int r, emulation_type = EMULTYPE_PF;
> - bool direct = vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map;
> + bool direct = vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.direct;
>
> if (WARN_ON(!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa)))
> return RET_PF_RETRY;
> @@ -5207,7 +5205,7 @@ int kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa, u64 error_code,
> * paging in both guests. If true, we simply unprotect the page
> * and resume the guest.
> */
> - if (vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map &&
> + if (vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.direct &&
> (error_code & PFERR_NESTED_GUEST_PAGE) == PFERR_NESTED_GUEST_PAGE) {
> kvm_mmu_unprotect_page(vcpu->kvm, gpa_to_gfn(cr2_or_gpa));
> return 1;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 657aa646871e..b910fa34e57e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -7978,7 +7978,7 @@ static bool reexecute_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!(emulation_type & EMULTYPE_PF)))
> return false;
>
> - if (!vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map) {
> + if (!vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.direct) {
> /*
> * Write permission should be allowed since only
> * write access need to be emulated.
> @@ -8011,7 +8011,7 @@ static bool reexecute_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
> kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
>
> /* The instructions are well-emulated on direct mmu. */
> - if (vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map) {
> + if (vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.direct) {
> unsigned int indirect_shadow_pages;
>
> write_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> @@ -8079,7 +8079,7 @@ static bool retry_instruction(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> vcpu->arch.last_retry_eip = ctxt->eip;
> vcpu->arch.last_retry_addr = cr2_or_gpa;
>
> - if (!vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map)
> + if (!vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.direct)
> gpa = kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_write(vcpu, cr2_or_gpa, NULL);
>
> kvm_mmu_unprotect_page(vcpu->kvm, gpa_to_gfn(gpa));
> @@ -8359,7 +8359,7 @@ int x86_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
> ctxt->exception.address = cr2_or_gpa;
>
> /* With shadow page tables, cr2 contains a GVA or nGPA. */
> - if (vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map) {
> + if (vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.direct) {
> ctxt->gpa_available = true;
> ctxt->gpa_val = cr2_or_gpa;
> }
> @@ -12196,7 +12196,7 @@ void kvm_arch_async_page_ready(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_async_pf *work)
> {
> int r;
>
> - if ((vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map != work->arch.direct_map) ||
> + if ((vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.direct != work->arch.direct_map) ||
> work->wakeup_all)
> return;
>
> @@ -12204,7 +12204,7 @@ void kvm_arch_async_page_ready(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_async_pf *work)
> if (unlikely(r))
> return;
>
> - if (!vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map &&
> + if (!vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.direct &&
> work->arch.cr3 != vcpu->arch.mmu->get_guest_pgd(vcpu))
> return;
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>

Next message: Chun-Kuang Hu: "Re: [PATCH v15 04/12] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: dsc: add yaml for mt8195 SoC binding"
Previous message: David Matlack: "Re: [PATCH 22/23] KVM: MMU: use cpu_role for root_level"
In reply to: Paolo Bonzini: "[PATCH 23/23] KVM: MMU: replace direct_map with mmu_role.direct"
Next in thread: David Matlack: "Re: [PATCH 00/23] KVM: MMU: MMU role refactoring"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]