Re: [PATCH 22/23] KVM: MMU: use cpu_role for root_level

From: David Matlack
Date: Mon Feb 07 2022 - 20:05:56 EST

Next message: David Matlack: "Re: [PATCH 23/23] KVM: MMU: replace direct_map with mmu_role.direct"
Previous message: Fenghua Yu: "[PATCH v4 08/11] x86/traps: Demand-populate PASID MSR via #GP"
In reply to: Paolo Bonzini: "[PATCH 22/23] KVM: MMU: use cpu_role for root_level"
Next in thread: Paolo Bonzini: "[PATCH 21/23] KVM: MMU: store shadow_root_level into mmu_role"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 06:57:17AM -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Remove another duplicate field of struct kvm_mmu. This time it's
> the root level for page table walking; we were already initializing
> it mostly as cpu_role.base.level, but the field still existed;
> remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>

nit: How about the following for the shortlog?

KVM: MMU: Replace root_level with cpu_role.base.level

Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 -
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c | 6 +++---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h | 4 ++--
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 867fc82f1de5..c86a2beee92a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -432,7 +432,6 @@ struct kvm_mmu {
> gpa_t root_pgd;
> union kvm_mmu_role cpu_role;
> union kvm_mmu_page_role mmu_role;
> - u8 root_level;
> bool direct_map;
> struct kvm_mmu_root_info prev_roots[KVM_MMU_NUM_PREV_ROOTS];
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 4d1fa87718f8..5a6541d6a424 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -2146,7 +2146,7 @@ static void shadow_walk_init_using_root(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterato
> iterator->level = vcpu->arch.mmu->mmu_role.level;
>
> if (iterator->level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL &&
> - vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level < PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL &&
> + vcpu->arch.mmu->cpu_role.base.level < PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL &&
> !vcpu->arch.mmu->direct_map)
> iterator->level = PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL;
>
> @@ -3255,7 +3255,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_free_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu,
>
> if (free_active_root) {
> if (mmu->mmu_role.level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL &&
> - (mmu->root_level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL || mmu->direct_map)) {
> + (mmu->cpu_role.base.level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL || mmu->direct_map)) {
> mmu_free_root_page(kvm, &mmu->root_hpa, &invalid_list);
> } else if (mmu->pae_root) {
> for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
> @@ -3453,7 +3453,7 @@ static int mmu_alloc_shadow_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * On SVM, reading PDPTRs might access guest memory, which might fault
> * and thus might sleep. Grab the PDPTRs before acquiring mmu_lock.
> */
> - if (mmu->root_level == PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL) {
> + if (mmu->cpu_role.base.level == PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL) {
> for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
> pdptrs[i] = mmu->get_pdptr(vcpu, i);
> if (!(pdptrs[i] & PT_PRESENT_MASK))
> @@ -3477,7 +3477,7 @@ static int mmu_alloc_shadow_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * Do we shadow a long mode page table? If so we need to
> * write-protect the guests page table root.
> */
> - if (mmu->root_level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL) {
> + if (mmu->cpu_role.base.level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL) {
> root = mmu_alloc_root(vcpu, root_gfn, 0,
> mmu->mmu_role.level, false);
> mmu->root_hpa = root;
> @@ -3516,7 +3516,7 @@ static int mmu_alloc_shadow_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
> WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_VALID_PAE_ROOT(mmu->pae_root[i]));
>
> - if (mmu->root_level == PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL) {
> + if (mmu->cpu_role.base.level == PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL) {
> if (!(pdptrs[i] & PT_PRESENT_MASK)) {
> mmu->pae_root[i] = INVALID_PAE_ROOT;
> continue;
> @@ -3558,7 +3558,7 @@ static int mmu_alloc_special_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * equivalent level in the guest's NPT to shadow. Allocate the tables
> * on demand, as running a 32-bit L1 VMM on 64-bit KVM is very rare.
> */
> - if (mmu->direct_map || mmu->root_level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL ||
> + if (mmu->direct_map || mmu->cpu_role.base.level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL ||
> mmu->mmu_role.level < PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -3655,7 +3655,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_sync_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> vcpu_clear_mmio_info(vcpu, MMIO_GVA_ANY);
>
> - if (vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL) {
> + if (vcpu->arch.mmu->cpu_role.base.level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL) {
> hpa_t root = vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa;
> sp = to_shadow_page(root);
>
> @@ -4146,7 +4146,7 @@ static bool fast_pgd_switch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t new_pgd,
> * later if necessary.
> */
> if (mmu->mmu_role.level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL &&
> - mmu->root_level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL)
> + mmu->cpu_role.base.level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL)
> return cached_root_available(vcpu, new_pgd, new_role);
>
> return false;
> @@ -4335,7 +4335,7 @@ static void reset_rsvds_bits_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> {
> __reset_rsvds_bits_mask(&context->guest_rsvd_check,
> vcpu->arch.reserved_gpa_bits,
> - context->root_level, is_efer_nx(context),
> + context->cpu_role.base.level, is_efer_nx(context),
> guest_can_use_gbpages(vcpu),
> is_cr4_pse(context),
> guest_cpuid_is_amd_or_hygon(vcpu));
> @@ -4739,7 +4739,6 @@ static void init_kvm_tdp_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, union kvm_mmu_role cpu_role)
> context->get_guest_pgd = get_cr3;
> context->get_pdptr = kvm_pdptr_read;
> context->inject_page_fault = kvm_inject_page_fault;
> - context->root_level = cpu_role.base.level;
>
> if (!is_cr0_pg(context))
> context->gva_to_gpa = nonpaging_gva_to_gpa;
> @@ -4769,7 +4768,6 @@ static void shadow_mmu_init_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *conte
> paging64_init_context(context);
> else
> paging32_init_context(context);
> - context->root_level = cpu_role.base.level;
>
> reset_guest_paging_metadata(vcpu, context);
> }
> @@ -4854,7 +4852,6 @@ void kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool execonly,
> context->gva_to_gpa = ept_gva_to_gpa;
> context->sync_page = ept_sync_page;
> context->invlpg = ept_invlpg;
> - context->root_level = level;
> context->direct_map = false;
> update_permission_bitmask(context, true);
> context->pkru_mask = 0;
> @@ -4889,7 +4886,6 @@ static void init_kvm_nested_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, union kvm_mmu_role new_ro
> g_context->get_guest_pgd = get_cr3;
> g_context->get_pdptr = kvm_pdptr_read;
> g_context->inject_page_fault = kvm_inject_page_fault;
> - g_context->root_level = new_role.base.level;
>
> /*
> * L2 page tables are never shadowed, so there is no need to sync
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
> index f31fdb874f1f..eb9c59fcb957 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
> @@ -59,11 +59,11 @@ static void mmu_spte_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, inspect_spte_fn fn)
> if (!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa))
> return;
>
> - if (vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL) {
> + if (vcpu->arch.mmu->cpu_role.base.level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL) {
> hpa_t root = vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa;
>
> sp = to_shadow_page(root);
> - __mmu_spte_walk(vcpu, sp, fn, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level);
> + __mmu_spte_walk(vcpu, sp, fn, vcpu->arch.mmu->cpu_role.base.level);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static void audit_mappings(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level)
> hpa = pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> if ((*sptep & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK) != hpa)
> audit_printk(vcpu->kvm, "levels %d pfn %llx hpa %llx "
> - "ent %llxn", vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level, pfn,
> + "ent %llxn", vcpu->arch.mmu->cpu_role.base.level, pfn,
> hpa, *sptep);
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
> index 847c4339e4d9..dd0b6f83171f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
> @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int FNAME(walk_addr_generic)(struct guest_walker *walker,
>
> trace_kvm_mmu_pagetable_walk(addr, access);
> retry_walk:
> - walker->level = mmu->root_level;
> + walker->level = mmu->cpu_role.base.level;
> pte = mmu->get_guest_pgd(vcpu);
> have_ad = PT_HAVE_ACCESSED_DIRTY(mmu);
>
> @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static int FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
> WARN_ON_ONCE(gw->gfn != base_gfn);
> direct_access = gw->pte_access;
>
> - top_level = vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level;
> + top_level = vcpu->arch.mmu->cpu_role.base.level;
> if (top_level == PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL)
> top_level = PT32_ROOT_LEVEL;
> /*
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>

Next message: David Matlack: "Re: [PATCH 23/23] KVM: MMU: replace direct_map with mmu_role.direct"
Previous message: Fenghua Yu: "[PATCH v4 08/11] x86/traps: Demand-populate PASID MSR via #GP"
In reply to: Paolo Bonzini: "[PATCH 22/23] KVM: MMU: use cpu_role for root_level"
Next in thread: Paolo Bonzini: "[PATCH 21/23] KVM: MMU: store shadow_root_level into mmu_role"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]