Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the arm-soc tree

[Arınç ÜNAL]

Hey Florian.

I'm not sure I understand what's going wrong here. I did everything 
according to the documentation here:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/realtek-smi.txt#L158

On 23/12/2021 02:58, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 12/22/21 3:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:59 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the arm-soc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > > multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
> > >
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47094-asus-rt-ac88u.dts:109.4-14: Warning (reg_format): /switch/ports:reg: property has invalid length (4 bytes) (#address-cells == 2, #size-cells == 1)
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47094-asus-rt-ac88u.dtb: Warning (pci_device_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47094-asus-rt-ac88u.dtb: Warning (pci_device_bus_num): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47094-asus-rt-ac88u.dtb: Warning (i2c_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47094-asus-rt-ac88u.dtb: Warning (spi_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47094-asus-rt-ac88u.dts:106.9-149.5: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /switch/ports: Relying on default #address-cells value
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47094-asus-rt-ac88u.dts:106.9-149.5: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /switch/ports: Relying on default #size-cells value
> > >
> > > Maybe introduced by commit
> > >
> > >    3d2d52a0d183 ("ARM: dts: BCM5301X: define RTL8365MB switch on Asus RT-AC88U")
> >
> > Confirmed, and now reverted as I'm already tagging the final pull requests.
> >
> > Arınç, Florian: Feel free to resubmit a fixed version for the "late"
> > branch that Olof
> > may still pick up when I'm out of office, in case this is an important
> > change. Otherwise
> > I guess we can leave it for 5.18
>
> Will do, thanks and sorry about not catching this earlier, I did not see
> it it in the build log somehow.