Re: [PATCH v2 02/19] scsi: libsas and users: Remove notifier indirection

[Ahmed S. Darwish]

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 11:36:21AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 12/01/2021 11:06, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > From: John Garry<john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The LLDDs report events to libsas with .notify_port_event and
> > .notify_phy_event callbacks.
> >
> > These callbacks are fixed and so there is no reason why we cannot call the
> > functions directly, so do that.
> >
> > This neatens the code slightly.
> >
> > [a.darwish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: Remove the now unused "sas_ha" local variables]
> > Signed-off-by: John Garry<john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Don't forget your signed-off-by :)
>

Oh, yes.

> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/scsi/libsas.rst b/Documentation/scsi/libsas.rst
> > index f9b77c7879db..a183b1d84713 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/scsi/libsas.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/scsi/libsas.rst
> > @@ -189,8 +189,8 @@ num_phys
> >   The event interface::
> >   	/* LLDD calls these to notify the class of an event. */
> > -	void (*notify_port_event)(struct sas_phy *, enum port_event);
> > -	void (*notify_phy_event)(struct sas_phy *, enum phy_event);
> > +	void sas_notify_port_event(struct sas_phy *, enum port_event);
> > +	void sas_notify_phy_event(struct sas_phy *, enum phy_event);
> >   When sas_register_ha() returns, those are set and can be
> >   called by the LLDD to notify the SAS layer of such events
>
> Maybe this was missed in the rebase, but I think that this comment can go/be
> changed at some stage.
>

Yeah, I pulled the patch yesterday from:

  https://github.com/hisilicon/kernel-dev/commit/87fcd7e113dc05b7933260e7fa4588dc3730cc2a

Lemme check if there are any other differences.

Thanks,
--
Ahmed S. Darwish