Re: [PATCH v2 02/19] scsi: libsas and users: Remove notifier indirection

From: John Garry
Date: Tue Jan 12 2021 - 06:38:35 EST


On 12/01/2021 11:06, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
From: John Garry<john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>

The LLDDs report events to libsas with .notify_port_event and
.notify_phy_event callbacks.

These callbacks are fixed and so there is no reason why we cannot call the
functions directly, so do that.

This neatens the code slightly.

[a.darwish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: Remove the now unused "sas_ha" local variables]
Signed-off-by: John Garry<john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>

Don't forget your signed-off-by :)

---
Documentation/scsi/libsas.rst | 4 +--
drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_scb.c | 20 ++++++-------
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c | 12 +++-----
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c | 3 +-
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v2_hw.c | 3 +-
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c | 3 +-
drivers/scsi/isci/port.c | 7 ++---
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_event.c | 13 +++------
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_init.c | 6 ----
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h | 1 -
drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c | 14 ++++-----
drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c | 40 ++++++++++++--------------
drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c | 7 ++---
drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c | 35 ++++++++++------------
include/scsi/libsas.h | 7 ++---
15 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/scsi/libsas.rst b/Documentation/scsi/libsas.rst
index f9b77c7879db..a183b1d84713 100644
--- a/Documentation/scsi/libsas.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scsi/libsas.rst
@@ -189,8 +189,8 @@ num_phys
The event interface::
/* LLDD calls these to notify the class of an event. */
- void (*notify_port_event)(struct sas_phy *, enum port_event);
- void (*notify_phy_event)(struct sas_phy *, enum phy_event);
+ void sas_notify_port_event(struct sas_phy *, enum port_event);
+ void sas_notify_phy_event(struct sas_phy *, enum phy_event);
When sas_register_ha() returns, those are set and can be
called by the LLDD to notify the SAS layer of such events

Maybe this was missed in the rebase, but I think that this comment can go/be changed at some stage.

Thanks,
John