Re: [PATCH 3/3] creds: convert cred.usage to refcount_t

From: Xiaoming Ni
Date: Sun Jun 14 2020 - 22:06:04 EST


On 2020/6/13 2:34, Kees Cook wrote:
From: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@xxxxxxxxx>

atomic_t variables are currently used to implement reference
counters with the following properties:
- counter is initialized to 1 using atomic_set()
- a resource is freed upon counter reaching zero
- once counter reaches zero, its further
increments aren't allowed
- counter schema uses basic atomic operations
(set, inc, inc_not_zero, dec_and_test, etc.)

Such atomic variables should be converted to a newly provided
refcount_t type and API that prevents accidental counter overflows
and underflows. This is important since overflows and underflows
can lead to use-after-free situation and be exploitable.

The variable cred.usage is used as pure reference counter.
Convert it to refcount_t and fix up the operations.

**Important note for maintainers:

Some functions from refcount_t API defined in lib/refcount.c
have different memory ordering guarantees than their atomic
counterparts.Please check Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
for more information.

Normally the differences should not matter since refcount_t provides
enough guarantees to satisfy the refcounting use cases, but in
some rare cases it might matter.
Please double check that you don't have some undocumented
memory guarantees for this variable usage.

For the cred.usage it might make a difference
in following places:
- get_task_cred(): increment in refcount_inc_not_zero() only
guarantees control dependency on success vs. fully ordered
atomic counterpart
- put_cred(): decrement in refcount_dec_and_test() only
provides RELEASE ordering and ACQUIRE ordering on success
vs. fully ordered atomic counterpart

Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190306110549.7628-4-elena.reshetova@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Currently this patch is better than my RFC patch
Looks good to me.

Thanks
Xiaoming Ni