Re: [PATCH] IMA: policy can be updated zero times

[Petko Manolov]

On 15-12-22 16:50:01, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 12/22/2015 04:40 PM, Petko Manolov wrote:
> >> Thanks, Sasha.  By the time ima_update_policy() is called
> >> >ima_release_policy() has already output the policy update status
> >> >message.  I guess an empty policy could be considered a valid policy.
> >> >Could you add a msg indicating that the new policy was empty?
> > 
> > As far as I can say we can't get to ima_update_policy() with empty 
> > ima_temp_rules because ima_write_policy() will set valid_policy to 0 in case 
> > of an empty rule.  I'll double check it tomorrow, but please you do that 
> > too.
> 
> This is based on an actual crash rather than code analysis.

I was able to reproduce the crash with: echo "" > /sys/kernel/security/ima/policy

It turns out ima_parse_add_rule() returns 1, even though the string is empty 
This logic may be part of "empty policy is a valid policy" or something else.  
As it is more dangerous to change the behavior at this point i assume your patch 
is the right solution for the problem.

Acked-by: Petko Manolov <petkan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Mimi, shall we change ima_parse_add_rule's behavior in the future or it's too 
much work?


cheers,
Petko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/