Re: [PATCH 4/6] i2c-parport: use new parport device model

[Jean Delvare]

On Wed, 20 May 2015 22:44:52 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:49:07PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:57:00PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > >  static struct parport_driver i2c_parport_driver = {
> > > -	.name	= "i2c-parport",
> > > -	.attach	= i2c_parport_attach,
> > > -	.detach	= i2c_parport_detach,
> > > +	.name		= "i2c-parport",
> > > +	.match_port	= i2c_parport_attach,
> > > +	.detach		= i2c_parport_detach,
> > > +	.devmodel	= true,
> > 
> > Minor nit: I prefer to not use tabs but a single space after the struct
> > member names. Less hazzle in the future and still readable IMO.
>
> It was having space originally. I changed that into tab as it was
> looking good with them as aligned.

As the driver maintainer, I am fine with both unaligned or tab-aligned.
Space-aligned as I did originally was not a good idea, I admit.

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/