Re: [PATCH v5 05/10] ARM: dts: Move dp_hpd from exynos5250 into smdk5250 and snow

From: Tomasz Figa
Date: Fri Aug 01 2014 - 16:57:18 EST


On 01.08.2014 22:54, Andreas FÃrber wrote:
> Doug,
>
> Am 01.08.2014 22:33, schrieb Doug Anderson:
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Andreas FÃrber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Spring uses a different GPIO, so this is not a generic SoC piece.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas FÃrber <afaerber@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> v5: New (Tomasz Figa)
>>> Frees dp_hpd for Spring.
>>>
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-pinctrl.dtsi | 7 -------
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 9 +++++++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts | 7 +++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-pinctrl.dtsi
>>> index 886cfca044ac..ed0e5230514b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-pinctrl.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-pinctrl.dtsi
>>> @@ -581,13 +581,6 @@
>>> samsung,pin-pud = <0>;
>>> samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
>>> };
>>> -
>>> - dp_hpd: dp_hpd {
>>> - samsung,pins = "gpx0-7";
>>> - samsung,pin-function = <3>;
>>> - samsung,pin-pud = <0>;
>>> - samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
>>> - };
>>> };
>>>
>>> pinctrl@13400000 {
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
>>> index aaa055ac0fe3..5d30fe1dcda4 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
>>> @@ -414,3 +414,12 @@
>>> };
>>> };
>>> };
>>> +
>>> +&pinctrl_0 {
>>> + dp_hpd: dp_hpd {
>>> + samsung,pins = "gpx0-7";
>>> + samsung,pin-function = <3>;
>>> + samsung,pin-pud = <0>;
>>> + samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
>>> index c4b0c73c736d..a9a2f2743794 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts
>>> @@ -547,6 +547,13 @@
>>> };
>>>
>>> &pinctrl_0 {
>>> + dp_hpd: dp_hpd {
>>> + samsung,pins = "gpx0-7";
>>> + samsung,pin-function = <3>;
>>> + samsung,pin-pud = <0>;
>>> + samsung,pin-drv = <0>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>
>> NAK. dp_hpd is a generic SoC piece. Pin function 0 and 1 are GPIOs.
>> Pin function 3 is special function. This pin _is_ the hot plug detect
>> pin for display port. When it's set as special function 3 it goes
>> straight into the hot plug logic of the display port controller.
>>
>> Spring may have had its reasons to detect hot plug events on a GPIO
>> instead of using this pin, but that doesn't make this pin any less the
>> "hot plug pin".
>
> Please advise how to handle it then: Should there be two different
> pinctrl entries (if so, how should it be named?),

IMHO this is the right way. Just name the GPIO variant dp_hpd_gpio.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/