Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] printk: more log flag simplification

[Alex Elder]

On 07/22/2014 09:24 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 09:01:55AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
>> This series eliminates the LOG_CONT entirely from the printk/log code.
>> It builds on another series, posted earlier today:
>>     http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1791665.html
>> This series was originally longer, but in review I was reminded
>> that some of the simplifications I had done were not valid.
>>
>> The first patch exploits the fact that LOG_CONT and LOG_NEWLINE
>> are inverses, and uses LOG_NEWLINE (or its negation) anywhere
>> LOG_CONT is used.  As a result, LOG_CONT is no longer needed, so
>> it's eliminated.
>>
>> The second patch improves some comments and makes a few small
>> code cleanups, now that it's gone through this transformation.
> 
> This is getting ridiculous - you've been spamming me with printk patches
> like crazy every day! I told you to wait a bit with a resend until
> people have had a chance to review them, but you don't seem to care.
> 
> Would you please remove me from your CC list?

Yes.	-Alex

> Thank you.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/