Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] printk: more log flag simplification

[Borislav Petkov]

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 09:01:55AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> This series eliminates the LOG_CONT entirely from the printk/log code.
> It builds on another series, posted earlier today:
>     http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1791665.html
> This series was originally longer, but in review I was reminded
> that some of the simplifications I had done were not valid.
> 
> The first patch exploits the fact that LOG_CONT and LOG_NEWLINE
> are inverses, and uses LOG_NEWLINE (or its negation) anywhere
> LOG_CONT is used.  As a result, LOG_CONT is no longer needed, so
> it's eliminated.
> 
> The second patch improves some comments and makes a few small
> code cleanups, now that it's gone through this transformation.

This is getting ridiculous - you've been spamming me with printk patches
like crazy every day! I told you to wait a bit with a resend until
people have had a chance to review them, but you don't seem to care.

Would you please remove me from your CC list?

Thank you.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/