Re: [PATCH v2] misc: Reserve minor for VFIO

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Date: Thu Dec 19 2013 - 21:38:42 EST


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:02:38PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 01:01 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:56:32PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >> VFIO currently allocates it's own dynamic chardev range, reserving the
> >> first minor for the control part of the interface (/dev/vfio/vfio) and
> >> the remainder for VFIO groups (/dev/vfio/$GROUP). This works, but it
> >> doesn't support auto loading. For instance when libvirt checks for
> >> VFIO support it looks for /dev/vfio/vfio, which currently doesn't
> >> exist unless the vfio module is loaded. By converting the control
> >> device to a misc driver and reserving a static minor, we can enable
> >> auto loading.

Why not have libvirt or systemctl try to load vfio first? If it does
not work it would error out.

Or perhaps make the loading of modules in /dev/vfio automatic? I thought
it was based on the name?

> >>
> >> Reserving the minor is a prerequist to that conversion. Minor 196
> >> is unused by anything currently in the kernel.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> v2: Plea for ack edition
> >>
> >> As Alan suspected, there's been no response from device@xxxxxxxxxx,
> >> so there's probably nobody monitoring it anymore. I've done due
> >> diligence looking at all the callers of misc_register() in linux-next
> >> and cannot find any conflicts with minor 196. If anyone wants to toss
> >> me an ack or sign-off I'll be happy to bring this in through my vfio
> >> tree, otherwise I'd appreciate if someone wants to take it directly.
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Documentation/devices.txt | 1 +
> >> include/linux/miscdevice.h | 1 +
> >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
>
> I think Alan Cox was the last person to man <device@xxxxxxxxxx>... Alan,
> are you still doing that? (Otherwise patching the file in the Linux
> kernel tree seems eminently sensible... there really isn't any need to
> reserve numbers for out-of-tree drivers anymore. Just another perk of
> being in-tree.)
>
> -hpa
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/