Re: [PATCH V4] cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, November 28, 2013 07:49:29 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28 November 2013 19:53, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I don't think that the Nishanth's issue is fixed by this particular version of
> > the patch, so I modified the changelog and removed a the comment above
> > cpufreq_suspend()
> 
> No, it does fix his issue as we are just stopping the governors from
> dpm_suspend_noirq() and not initiating any new transitions. I said we need
> these calls from dpm_suspend() instead as platforms like exynos and tegra
> do need to change frequency before suspending..
> 
> See:
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/692
> 
> > (which should be a proper kerneldoc one if any, BTW).
> 
> Okay.. I will add that separately..
> 
> > I've also made some minor changes to the conditionals, because I didn't like them
> > the way they were written originally.
> >
> > Please check the result in bleeding-edge.
> 
> Everything else is fine..

So I'm reading this as "the version of the patch in bleeding-edge is OK".

I hope that really is the case. :-)

Thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/