Re: [PATCH V4] cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate

[Viresh Kumar]

On 28 November 2013 19:53, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't think that the Nishanth's issue is fixed by this particular version of
> the patch, so I modified the changelog and removed a the comment above
> cpufreq_suspend()

No, it does fix his issue as we are just stopping the governors from
dpm_suspend_noirq() and not initiating any new transitions. I said we need
these calls from dpm_suspend() instead as platforms like exynos and tegra
do need to change frequency before suspending..

See:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/692

> (which should be a proper kerneldoc one if any, BTW).

Okay.. I will add that separately..

> I've also made some minor changes to the conditionals, because I didn't like them
> the way they were written originally.
>
> Please check the result in bleeding-edge.

Everything else is fine..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/