Re: [PATCH 02/16] staging/lustre/llog: MGC to use OSD API for backuplogs

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Mon Nov 25 2013 - 22:33:27 EST


On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:25:24AM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:04:56AM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
> >> From: Mikhail Pershin <mike.pershin@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> MGC uses lvfs API to access local llogs blocking removal of old code
> >>
> >> - MGS is converted to use OSD API for local llogs
> >> - llog_is_empty() and llog_backup() are introduced
> >> - initial OSD start initialize run ctxt so llog can use it too
> >> - shrink dcache after initial scrub in osd-ldiskfs to avoid holding
> >> data of unlinked objects until umount.
> >
> > It is not checkpatch clean :(
> >
> > Come on, it's not hard to do this yourself, why do you make me find
> > these errors for you? It does nothing but make me not want to look at
> > lustre patches for a long time...
>
> Strange. I did run checkpatch before sending the patchset out.
>
> Just tried again. Still pass.
>
> [X61@linux-lustre]$./scripts/checkpatch.pl
> 0002-staging-lustre-llog-MGC-to-use-OSD-API-for-backup-lo.patch total:
> 0 errors, 0 warnings, 883 lines checked
>
> 0002-staging-lustre-llog-MGC-to-use-OSD-API-for-backup-lo.patch has no
> obvious style problems and is ready for submission.
>
> What message did you see?

One about return();

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/