Re: [PATCH 150/150] kernel/signal.c: use __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER instead of SA_RESTORER

[PaX Team]

sorry if you got this twice, had smtpd problems...

On 26 Mar 2013 at 15:20, Luis Henriques wrote:

> 3.5.7.9 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> ------------------
> 
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> commit 522cff142d7d2f9230839c9e1f21a4d8bcc22a4a upstream.
> 
> __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER is the preferred conditional for use in 3.9 and
> later kernels, per Kees.

does __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER exist in the 3.5 stable series at all? i thought it
was new to 3.9...



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/