Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpu0: Fix mistake in Documentation example

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 08:10:46 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> "clock-latency" is incorrectly written as "transition-latency" in an example
> present in Documentation of cpufreq-cpu0. Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

Am I supposed to take this?

Rafael


> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
> index 4416ccc..051f764 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ cpus {
>  			396000  950000
>  			198000  850000
>  		>;
> -		transition-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
> +		clock-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
>  	};
>  
>  	cpu@1 {
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/