[PATCH] cpufreq: cpu0: Fix mistake in Documentation example

[Viresh Kumar]

"clock-latency" is incorrectly written as "transition-latency" in an example
present in Documentation of cpufreq-cpu0. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
index 4416ccc..051f764 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ cpus {
 			396000  950000
 			198000  850000
 		>;
-		transition-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
+		clock-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
 	};
 
 	cpu@1 {
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/