Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86, cleanups: Simplify sync_core() in the case ofno CPUID

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Thu Nov 29 2012 - 16:24:15 EST


On 11/28/2012 12:41 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> While at it, you could correct this comment to adhere to kernel coding
> style:
>
> /*
> * cpuid is a barrier...
> * ...
> */
>
>> + asm volatile("cpuid" : "=a" (tmp) : "0" (1)
>> + : "ebx", "ecx", "edx", "memory");
>
> ... and then write this in its shorter form:
>
> tmp = cpuid_eax(1);
>
> to have it a bit easier on the eyes.
>

Thinking about it some more, there is another reason to not do this,
which is that we don't want this particular CPUID to be paravirtualized;
we're after the synchronizing side effect, not the CPUID return value
itself.

So let's leave it as a primitive; it gets too confusing otherwise.

-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/