Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

[Mel Gorman]

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > 
> > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one
> > > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread along with the latest
> > > schednuma figures I have available.
> > > 
> > 
> > Report is linked here https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/21/202
> > 
> > I ended up cancelling the remaining tests and restarted with
> > 
> > 1. schednuma + patches posted since so that works out as
> 
> Mel, I'd like to ask you to refer to our tree as numa/core or 
> 'numacore' in the future. Would such a courtesy to use the 
> current name of our tree be possible?
> 

Sure, no problem.

> (We dropped sched/numa long ago and that you still keep 
> referring to it is rather confusing to me.)
> 

Understood.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/