Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed Nov 21 2012 - 12:03:05 EST



* Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >
> > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one
> > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread along with the latest
> > schednuma figures I have available.
> >
>
> Report is linked here https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/21/202
>
> I ended up cancelling the remaining tests and restarted with
>
> 1. schednuma + patches posted since so that works out as

Mel, I'd like to ask you to refer to our tree as numa/core or
'numacore' in the future. Would such a courtesy to use the
current name of our tree be possible?

(We dropped sched/numa long ago and that you still keep
referring to it is rather confusing to me.)

Thanks!

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/