Re: [PATCH 0/4] cputime: Virtual cputime accounting small cleanupsand consolidation

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Jun 21 2012 - 04:30:59 EST


On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 02:46 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > So I understand why s390,ia64 want the sched hook, but I don't see why
> > ppc would need it, their account_process_tick() can fold whatever they
> > need on the tick.
>
> I think in any case you need to flush the time on a descheduling task otherwise
> its pending time will be accounted later to the next task when it
> receives an irq.
>
> So I fear we still need that sched switch hook even with per cpu data. This
> may be a simple account_system_vtime() call.

Did I miss a per-task something in there?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/