Re: [PATCH] fs: fix integer overflow in MS_NOUSER definition

[Konstantin Khlebnikov]

Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 09:49:49AM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > MS_NOUSER defined as signed int (1<<31), sb->s_flags declared as unsigned long.
> > So (sb->s_flags&  MS_NOUSER) works as (sb->s_flags&  0xffffffff80000000).
>
> ... and it's not a problem since we can't use bits 32 and above anyway -
> unsigned long is 32bit on a lot of platforms.  I have no objections to
> making that 1U<<31, but it's not a bug, let alone an integer overflow.

Yes, it's not a bug here, but I not sure about the rest thousand places, where
similar expressions are used. Probably checkpatch should warn about such things.

BTW this patch makes code smaller =)

add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-16 (-16)
function                                     old     new   delta
graft_tree                                   135     119     -16
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/