Re: [PATCH] USB: EHCI: Don't use NO_IRQ in xilinx ehci driver

From: Michal Simek
Date: Fri Jan 13 2012 - 06:27:55 EST


Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Michal Simek wrote:

Drivers shouldn't use NO_IRQ. This driver is used
by Microblaze and PPC. PPC defines NO_IRQ as 0
and Microblaze has removed it.

Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC: devicetree-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
drivers/usb/host/ehci-xilinx-of.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-xilinx-of.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-xilinx-of.c
index 32793ce..9c2cc46 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-xilinx-of.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-xilinx-of.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int __devinit ehci_hcd_xilinx_of_probe(struct platform_device *op)
}
irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(dn, 0);
- if (irq == NO_IRQ) {
+ if (!irq) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: irq_of_parse_and_map failed\n", __FILE__);
rv = -EBUSY;
goto err_irq;

Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks Alan.

I have seen that Grant sent the same patch to lkml too.
Here is the thread: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/11/342

Grant: How fast do you think you are able to merge your patches?

Currently I have remove NO_IRQ from Microblaze and we use this driver which
means that driver compilation failed right now. That's why I would like to fix asap.

Thanks,
Michal

--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/