Re: CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vsunpinnede

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:33 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> 
> This is perhaps not optimal (as it may lead to more lock contentions), but 
> something to note for those who care for both capping and utilization in
> equal measure!

You meant lock inversion, which leads to more idle time :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/