Re: [PATCH 1/4] dynamic_debug: consolidate repetitive struct _ddebugdescriptor definitions

[Jim Cromie]

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 20:42 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:13:16 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 16:52 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:28:41 -0400
>> > > > Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > > > Replace the repetitive struct _ddebug descriptor definitions with
>> > > > > a new DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_META_DATA(name, fmt) macro.
>> > > > > +#define DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(name, fmt) Â Â Â Â Â Â Â\
>> > > > > + Â Â Â static struct _ddebug __used __aligned(8) Â Â Â Â Â Â Â \
>> > > > > + Â Â Â __attribute__((section("__verbose"))) name = { Â Â Â Â Â\
>> > > > > + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â .modname = KBUILD_MODNAME, Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â\
>> > > > > + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â .function = __func__, Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â \
>> > > > > + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â .filename = __FILE__, Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â \
>> > > > > + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â .format = (fmt), Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â\
>> > > > > + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â .lineno = __LINE__, Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â \
>> > > > > + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â .flags = Â_DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT, Â Â Â Â Â Â Â \
>> > > > > + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â .enabled = false, Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â \
>> > > > > + Â Â Â }
>> > > > <anal>That macro implements a definition, not a declaration</anal>
>> > > Andrew, that's not quite true
>> > It's precisely true.
>> Not according to the c99 standard section 6.7
>
> Have you read that paragraph ? This is what I found in paragraph 6.7,
> which confirms Andrews interpretation:
>
> <quote>
> A declaration speciïes the interpretation and attributes of a set of
> identiïers. A deïnition of an identiïer is a declaration for that
> identiïer that:
> - for an object, causes storage to be reserved for that object;
> - for a function, includes the function body;
> - for an enumeration constant or typedef name, is the (only)
> declaration of the identiïer.
> </quote>
>
> Bart.
>


I hesitate to churn this more (I have patchset to go on top of all this) but

Id like to see an INIT_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA,
along with ability to expose the descriptor.

This would support pr_dbg_cont(), by letting it see/reuse
the same descriptor that controls the pr_debug that started
the multi-call message.  While this defeats the "atomicity"
of buffering the entire message before calling printk,
it does so only for the actual uses of KERN_CONT.

It also allows for "lite" usage of dynamic-debug,
including 1..few descriptor per file or module to control all debug printing.
As outlined, this "lite" usage is determined by the coder,
it would be cool if it were more configurable than that,
but I dont see how that would work atm.


Now that the worms have escaped the can, one other thought:
	unsigned int lineno:24;
allows for insanely large files.  The largest in the tree is 29k,
16 bits would cover all files likely to be accepted in the future.
Even allowing for never-to-be-submitted machine-generated code,
Id think 18 bits would suffice.  ~250k lines should be enough ;-)

Given that my patchset adds flags-filtering
( echo mt+p > $CONTROL )
The availability of user-flags, which do nothing but mark callsites,
has some value - user can mark arbitrary sets of callsites,
then enable/disable them as a group or subgroup:

echo function foo +x > $CONTROL
...
echo x+p > $CONTROL
echo y-p > $CONTROL
echo z+p > $CONTROL
echo yz-p > $CONTROL

Since since it works with module/file/function filtering, 3-4 user
flags should be plenty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/