Re: [PATCH 02/16] freezer: don't unnecessarily set PF_NOFREEZEexplicitly

[Samuel Ortiz]

Hi Tejun,

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Some drivers set PF_NOFREEZE in their kthread functions which is
> completely unnecessary and racy - some part of freezer code doesn't
> consider cases where PF_NOFREEZE is set asynchronous to freezer
> operations.
> 
> In general, there's no reason to allow setting PF_NOFREEZE explicitly.
> Remove them and change the documentation to note that setting
> PF_NOFREEZE directly isn't allowed.

For the mfd parts:

Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/