Re: [patch 00/36] Hexagon: Add support for Qualcomm Hexagonarchitecture

[Richard Kuo]

> It's good to finally see the source for this, and I have a good feeling
> about the quality of the code, so it should not be a problem to resolve
> the remaining issues in time to get it into the next merge window.
> 
> I have gone over all patches once now and commented about everything
> that looked odd or wrong. Most of the issues are really just small
> changes. Removing support for the legacy syscalls is an easy change
> in the kernel but it might require significant changes in the libc
> implementation. It's not a big problem if your libc still requires the
> old interfaces at the time the architecture gets merged upstream,
> that will just mean that you have to have a small kernel patch to add
> them back in while transitioning to the new libc.

Thanks for reviewing the patches!  I've started working on some of the
feedback and will be answering other questions as I get to them.

> As I commented on patch 33, I think the platform specific patches should
> not get merged before everything is converted to device tree based
> probing. This should also not keep the rest from going in. I think it
> would be good to do the conversion together with the ARM-MSM platform
> that seems to share a lot of the device specific code, and it would
> be bad to end up with duplicate work here or (worse) with incompatible
> DT bindings.

OK, sounds fair.  I have been working on devtree code on the side, but for
this first submission, it sounds like I'll just gut the platform code
out.


Thanks,
Richard Kuo


-- 

Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/