Re: x86 memcpy performance

[Andi Kleen]

melwyn lobo <linux.melwyn@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi All,
> Our Video recorder application uses memcpy for every frame. About 2KB
> data every frame on Intel Atomâ Z5xx processor.
> With default 2.6.35 kernel we got 19.6 fps. But it seems kernel
> implemented memcpy is suboptimal, because when we replaced
> with an optmized one (using ssse3, exact patches are currently being
> finalized) ew obtained 22fps a gain of 12.2 %.

SSE3 in the kernel memcpy would be incredible expensive,
it would need a full FPU saving for every call and preemption
disabled.

I haven't seen your patches, but until you get all that 
right (and add a lot more overhead to most copies) you
have a good change currently to corrupting user FPU state.

> C0 residency also reduced from 75% to 67%. This means power benefits too.
> My questions:
> 1. Is kernel memcpy profiled for optimal performance.

It depends on the CPU

There have been some improvements for Atom on newer kernels
I believe. 

But then kernel memcpy is usually optimized for relatively
small copies (<= 4K) because very few kernel loads do more.

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/