Re: [PATCH 6/7] perf, x86: Example code for AMD IBS

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Aug 02 2011 - 06:38:43 EST


On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 07:50 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 29.07.11 12:58:49, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:46 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > tools/perf/Documentation/examples/ibs.c | 436 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > That really isn't the place for this..
> >
> > Also, how similar is the Alpha PMU to AMD IBS?
>
> Would you prefer
>
> tools/perf/Documentation/examples/x86/ibs.c
>
> instead?

Possibly, but having just looked at the example again I don't really see
it doing anything perf-record doesn't already do, so why does it deserve
to live at all?

Initially I thought it was a record+report like example, some code
interpreting the 'mess' that comes out of IBS would be most appreciated
and I think we can even ship that as perf-ibs-report/perf-ibs-annotate
or so (and if its still remotely similar to its Alpha precursor that
might make the Alpha folks happy too).

> Actually I wasn't sure if this place is ok at all. But I wanted to
> publish the code for reference and testing. There isn't somthing
> similar already there, and the perf tool code is also not the best
> place to implement such cpu specific features.
>
> But putting it to the documentation is common practice for library
> packages (e.g. libpapi and libpfm). If the example is not for the
> given architecture it won't be added to the package documentation.
> This example won't be installed at all. Even for very special features
> an example is important since it is often not part of the generic
> implementation.

Right, its just that I'm not seeing the extra value at all, aside from
maybe the IBS_*_DEFAULT values that should live as an event config
(poking mlin to see where he's at with those patches..).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/