Re: [patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V6

[Hu Tao]

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 04:29:49PM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> (2011/06/14 15:58), Hu Tao wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I've run several tests including hackbench, unixbench, massive-intr
> > and kernel building. CPU is Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3430  @ 2.40GHz,
> > 4 cores, and 4G memory.
> > 
> > Most of the time the results differ few, but there are problems:
> > 
> > 1. unixbench: execl throughout has about 5% drop.
> > 2. unixbench: process creation has about 5% drop.
> > 3. massive-intr: when running 200 processes for 5mins, the number
> >    of loops each process runs differ more than before cfs-bandwidth-v6.
> > 
> > The results are attached.
> 
> I know the score of unixbench is not so stable that the problem might
> be noises ... but the result of massive-intr is interesting.
> Could you give a try to find which piece (xx/15) in the series cause
> the problems?

OK. I'll do it.

> 
> Thanks,
> H.Seto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/