Re: [patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V6

[Hidetoshi Seto]

(2011/06/14 15:58), Hu Tao wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've run several tests including hackbench, unixbench, massive-intr
> and kernel building. CPU is Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3430  @ 2.40GHz,
> 4 cores, and 4G memory.
> 
> Most of the time the results differ few, but there are problems:
> 
> 1. unixbench: execl throughout has about 5% drop.
> 2. unixbench: process creation has about 5% drop.
> 3. massive-intr: when running 200 processes for 5mins, the number
>    of loops each process runs differ more than before cfs-bandwidth-v6.
> 
> The results are attached.

I know the score of unixbench is not so stable that the problem might
be noises ... but the result of massive-intr is interesting.
Could you give a try to find which piece (xx/15) in the series cause
the problems?

Thanks,
H.Seto

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/