Re: [PATCH v3 -tip] x86, dumpstack: Correct stack dump info whenframe pointer is available

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 08:41:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> index 9d977a2ea693..53a770ef4eaf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> @@ -1722,7 +1722,7 @@ perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  
>  	perf_callchain_store(entry, regs->ip);
>  
> -	dump_trace(NULL, regs, NULL, &backtrace_ops, entry);
> +	dump_trace(NULL, regs, NULL, regs->bp, &backtrace_ops, entry);

I think this should be fine to push 0 instead of regs->bp because
stack_frame() will retrieve the value already.

That doesn't change anything except for the reviewer who won't need
to stick at trying to understand why we override the stack frame over the
default one in regs.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
> index 74cc1eda384b..c99f9ed013d5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
> @@ -17,12 +17,11 @@
>  #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
>  
>  
> -void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task,
> -		struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long *stack,
> +void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
> +		unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp,
>  		const struct stacktrace_ops *ops, void *data)
>  {
>  	int graph = 0;
> -	unsigned long bp;
>  
>  	if (!task)
>  		task = current;
> @@ -35,7 +34,9 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task,
>  			stack = (unsigned long *)task->thread.sp;
>  	}
>  
> -	bp = stack_frame(task, regs);
> +	if (!bp)
> +		bp = stack_frame(task, regs);
> +
>  	for (;;) {
>  		struct thread_info *context;
>  
> @@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_trace);
>  
>  void
>  show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
> -		   unsigned long *sp, char *log_lvl)
> +		   unsigned long *sp, unsigned long bp, char *log_lvl)
>  {
>  	unsigned long *stack;
>  	int i;
> @@ -77,7 +78,7 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
>  		touch_nmi_watchdog();
>  	}
>  	printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
> -	show_trace_log_lvl(task, regs, sp, log_lvl);
> +	show_trace_log_lvl(task, regs, sp, bp, log_lvl);
>  }
>  
>  
> @@ -102,7 +103,7 @@ void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  		u8 *ip;
>  
>  		printk(KERN_EMERG "Stack:\n");
> -		show_stack_log_lvl(NULL, regs, &regs->sp, KERN_EMERG);
> +		show_stack_log_lvl(NULL, regs, &regs->sp, 0, KERN_EMERG);

&regs->sp ? That looks wrong. But that's outside the scope of this patch.

>  
>  		printk(KERN_EMERG "Code: ");
>  
> @@ -115,16 +116,16 @@ void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  		for (i = 0; i < code_len; i++, ip++) {
>  			if (ip < (u8 *)PAGE_OFFSET ||
>  					probe_kernel_address(ip, c)) {
> -				printk(" Bad EIP value.");
> +				printk(KERN_CONT " Bad EIP value.");

All these KERN_CONT changes need to be in a separate patch.

>  				break;
>  			}
>  			if (ip == (u8 *)regs->ip)
> -				printk("<%02x> ", c);
> +				printk(KERN_CONT "<%02x> ", c);
>  			else
> -				printk("%02x ", c);
> +				printk(KERN_CONT "%02x ", c);
>  		}
>  	}
> -	printk("\n");
> +	printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
>  }
>  
>  int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long ip)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
> index a6b6fcf7f0ae..c316e23471a8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
> @@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ fixup_bp_irq_link(unsigned long bp, unsigned long *stack,
>   * severe exception (double fault, nmi, stack fault, debug, mce) hardware stack
>   */
>  
> -void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task,
> -		struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long *stack,
> +void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
> +		unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp,
>  		const struct stacktrace_ops *ops, void *data)
>  {
>  	const unsigned cpu = get_cpu();
> @@ -150,7 +150,6 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task,
>  	struct thread_info *tinfo;
>  	int graph = 0;
>  	unsigned long dummy;
> -	unsigned long bp;
>  
>  	if (!task)
>  		task = current;
> @@ -161,7 +160,8 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task,
>  			stack = (unsigned long *)task->thread.sp;
>  	}
>  
> -	bp = stack_frame(task, regs);
> +	if (!bp)
> +		bp = stack_frame(task, regs);
>  	/*
>  	 * Print function call entries in all stacks, starting at the
>  	 * current stack address. If the stacks consist of nested
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task,
>  
>  			bp = ops->walk_stack(tinfo, stack, bp, ops,
>  					     data, estack_end, &graph);
> -			ops->stack(data, "<EOE>");
> +			ops->stack(data, "EOE");

That needs to be in a seperate patch as well.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/