Re: [PATCH 1/8 resend] dw_dmac: Remove compilation dependency fromAVR32

From: viresh kumar
Date: Sun Mar 06 2011 - 23:15:52 EST


On 03/05/2011 05:08 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 09:49:09AM +0530, Shiraz Hashim wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:42:42AM +0800, Viresh KUMAR wrote:
>>> > > On 03/02/2011 10:16 PM, Koul, Vinod wrote:
>>>> > > > On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 16:11 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>>>>> > > >> drivers/dma/Kconfig | 1 -
>>>>> > > >> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>> > > >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/Kconfig b/drivers/dma/Kconfig
>>>>> > > >> index 1c28816..95c7db7 100644
>>>>> > > >> --- a/drivers/dma/Kconfig
>>>>> > > >> +++ b/drivers/dma/Kconfig
>>>>> > > >> @@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ config INTEL_IOP_ADMA
>>>>> > > >>
>>>>> > > >> config DW_DMAC
>>>>> > > >> tristate "Synopsys DesignWare AHB DMA support"
>>>>> > > >> - depends on AVR32
>>>> > > > Shouldn't you be adding a corresponding depends on new arch? And since
>>>> > > > this supports old arch as well, it should say depends on both...
>>> > >
>>> > > Why should this driver be dependent on ARM or AVR32? It can be present
>>> > > on any other arch too.. So i thought removing this dependency all together
>>> > > is better.
>> >
>> > There could be a dependency on HAVE_CLK as it uses clock APIs.
> If it uses the clk APIs then it should already depend on HAVE_CLK.

It wasn't. But i have done that in my patchset.

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/