RE: [PATCHv1] ARM: imx: Add support for low power suspend on MX51.

[Nguyen Dinh-R00091]

Hi Arnaud,


>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-
>bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Arnaud Patard
>Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 1:35 PM
>To: Nguyen Dinh-R00091
>Cc: linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; u.kleine-
>koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang Lily-R58066; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [PATCHv1] ARM: imx: Add support for low power suspend on MX51.
>
><Dinh.Nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>Hi,
>
>> From: Dinh Nguyen <Dinh.Nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Adds initial low power suspend functionality to MX51.
>> Supports "mem" and "standby" modes.
>
>I've very quickly tried suspend to mem on my system and despite having set
>some irq as wakeup source, it doesn't wake up. Is there some extra step
>to be done in order to test your patch ?
>
>Moreover, the code I've seen for suspend is very different. It's seems
>to handle some cpufreq stuff and seems to be copying some code into some
>special ram. Is all this stuff unneeded ?

I am able to wakeup using gpio-key on my mx51-babbage system if I comment out the most of the drivers except for the gpio-keys driver. Yes, there are additional cpufreq and code that needs to get run in IRAM for mx51, which I will add on to this patch. This is just the initial patch to put the SoC in to suspend and have other developers add to it.

Thanks,

Dinh

>
>Arnaud
>
>_______________________________________________
>linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/