Re: [PATCH 1/6] Staging: hv: Unify hyper-v device abstractions

[Greg KH]

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 05:13:34PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steven Rostedt [mailto:rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 10:21 PM
> > To: KY Srinivasan; r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Haiyang Zhang; Hank
> > Janssen
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Staging: hv: Unify hyper-v device abstractions
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Just an FYI,
> > 
> > When sending out patch series, could you send out a [PATCH 0/6] first,
> > and have all other patches a reply to that patch. Both git and quilt
> > have ways to do this.
> 
> My mistake; I numbered the patches 1 through 6 as opposed to 0 through 5.
> Sorry for the confusion.

Wait, what?

So, what should I apply here, only patches 2-6?  What is patch 1 for
then?

still totally confused,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/