Re: [PATCH] mm: remove worrying dead code from find_get_pages()

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 21:31 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> The radix_tree_deref_retry() case in find_get_pages() has a strange
> little excrescence, not seen in the other gang lookups: it looks like
> the start of an abandoned attempt to guarantee forward progress in a
> case that cannot arise.
> 
> ret should always be 0 here: if it isn't, then going back to restart
> will leak references to pages already gotten.  There used to be a
> comment saying nr_found is necessarily 1 here: that's not quite true,
> but the radix_tree_deref_retry() case is peculiar to the entry at index
> 0, when we race with it being moved out of the radix_tree root or back.
> 
> Remove the worrisome two lines, add a brief comment here and in
> find_get_pages_contig() and find_get_pages_tag(), and a WARN_ON
> in find_get_pages() should it ever be seen elsewhere than at 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/