Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: fix corruptions on i8xx due to relaxed fencing

From: Daniel Vetter
Date: Wed Feb 23 2011 - 02:10:35 EST


Am Mi, 23.02.2011, 07:59 schrieb Indan Zupancic:
> On Tue, February 22, 2011 18:25, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> It looks like gen2 has a peculiar interleaved 2-row inter-tile
>> layout. Probably inherited from i81x which had 2kb tiles (which
>> naturally fit an even-number-of-tile-rows scheme to fit onto 4kb
>> pages). There is no other mention of this in any docs (also not
>> in the Intel internal documention according to Chris Wilson).
>>
>> Problem manifests itself in corruptions in the second half of the
>> last tile row (if the bo has an odd number of tiles). Which can
>> only happen with relaxed tiling (introduced in a00b10c360b35d6431a9).
>>
>> So reject set_tiling calls that don't satisfy this constrain to
>> prevent broken userspace from causing havoc. While at it, also
>> check the size for newer chipsets.
>>
>> LKML: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/19/5
>> Reported-by: Indan Zupancic <indan@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
>> index 22a32b9..79a04fd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c
>> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ i915_gem_detect_bit_6_swizzle(struct drm_device
>> *dev)
>> static bool
>> i915_tiling_ok(struct drm_device *dev, int stride, int size, int
>> tiling_mode)
>> {
>> - int tile_width;
>> + int tile_width, tile_height;
>>
>> /* Linear is always fine */
>> if (tiling_mode == I915_TILING_NONE)
>> @@ -215,6 +215,20 @@ i915_tiling_ok(struct drm_device *dev, int stride,
>> int size, int
>> tiling_mode)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> + if (IS_GEN2(dev) ||
>> + (tiling_mode == I915_TILING_Y && HAS_128_BYTE_Y_TILING(dev)))
>> + tile_height = 32;
>> + else
>> + tile_height = 8;
>> + /* i8xx is strange: It has 2 interleaved rows of tiles, so needs an
>> even
>> + * number of tile rows. */
>> + if (IS_GEN2(dev))
>> + tile_height *= 2;
>> +
>> + /* Size needs to be aligned to a full tile row */
>> + if (size & (tile_height * stride - 1))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> /* 965+ just needs multiples of tile width */
>> if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4) {
>> if (stride & (tile_width - 1))
>
> Tested-by: Indan Zupancic <indan@xxxxxx>
>
> I tested with this patch and without the other ones you send and the
> corruption
> is indeed gone.
>
> Not sure why you dropped lkml from CC, now people who stuble upon it don't
> see
> the ending...

Random incoherency in my brain. Re-added to cc.
- Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/