Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] gpiolib: Add ability to get GPIO pin direction

From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Fri Feb 18 2011 - 03:57:43 EST


On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 05:03:17PM -0600, Peter Tyser wrote:
> Add a new get_direction() function to the gpio_chip structure. This is
> useful so that the direction of a pin can be determined when its
> initially exported. Previously, the direction defaulted to "unknown"
> regardless of the actual configuration of the GPIO pin.
>
> If a GPIO driver implements get_direction(), it is called in
> gpio_request() to set the initial direction of the pin accurately.
IMHO the commit log is conceptually wrong, because it talks about a
"pin". Better use gpio here.

> Cc: Alek Du <alek.du@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Add support for "unknown" direction
>
> Changes since v2:
> Based on Wolfram's feedback:
> - Use GPIOF_DIR_* flags as returns from get_direction()
> - Call spin_lock_irqsave() to before setting flags
>
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/asm-generic/gpio.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index eb74311..a656a2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -1174,6 +1174,7 @@ int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
> struct gpio_desc *desc;
> struct gpio_chip *chip;
> int status = -EINVAL;
> + int dir;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
> @@ -1214,6 +1215,28 @@ int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
> }
> }
>
> + if (chip->get_direction) {
> + /* chip->get_direction may sleep */
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
might_sleep_if(chip->can_sleep) ?

> + dir = chip->get_direction(chip, gpio - chip->base);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
> + switch (dir) {
> + case GPIOF_DIR_OUT:
> + set_bit(FLAG_DIR_OUT, &desc->flags);
> + clear_bit(FLAG_DIR_IN, &desc->flags);
> + break;
> + case GPIOF_DIR_IN:
> + set_bit(FLAG_DIR_IN, &desc->flags);
> + clear_bit(FLAG_DIR_OUT, &desc->flags);
> + break;
> + default:
> + /* Direction isn't known */
> + clear_bit(FLAG_DIR_OUT, &desc->flags);
> + clear_bit(FLAG_DIR_IN, &desc->flags);
> + break;
> + }
Alternatively to my suggestion for patch1:
} else {
clear_bit(FLAG_DIR_OUT, &desc->flags);
clear_bit(FLAG_DIR_IN, &desc->flags);
> + }
> +
> done:
> if (status)
> pr_debug("gpio_request: gpio-%d (%s) status %d\n",
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
> index ff5c660..6af5a3e 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ struct device_node;
> * @direction_input: configures signal "offset" as input, or returns error
> * @get: returns value for signal "offset"; for output signals this
> * returns either the value actually sensed, or zero
> + * @get_direction: optional hook to determine if a GPIO signal is configured
> + * as an input, output, or unknown
> * @direction_output: configures signal "offset" as output, or returns error
> * @set: assigns output value for signal "offset"
> * @to_irq: optional hook supporting non-static gpio_to_irq() mappings;
> @@ -101,6 +103,8 @@ struct gpio_chip {
> unsigned offset);
> int (*get)(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> unsigned offset);
> + int (*get_direction)(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> + unsigned offset);
> int (*direction_output)(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> unsigned offset, int value);
> int (*set_debounce)(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
>

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/