Re: [PATCH] Make swap accounting default behavior configurable

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:46:54 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:23:32 +0100
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed 17-11-10 12:28:01, Daisuke Nishimura wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:12:25 -0800
> > > Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:23:39 +0900 Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > > > > index ed45e98..14eafa5 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> > > > > > > @@ -2385,6 +2385,9 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file
> > > > > > >  			improve throughput, but will also increase the
> > > > > > >  			amount of memory reserved for use by the client.
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > +	swapaccount	[KNL] Enable accounting of swap in memory resource
> > > > > > > +			controller. (See Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > So we have swapaccount and noswapaccount.  Ho hum, "swapaccount=[1|0]"
> > > > > > would have been better.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > I suggested to keep "noswapaccount" for compatibility.
> > > > > If you and other guys don't like having two parameters, I don't stick to
> > > > > the old parameter.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, we're stuck with the old one now.
> > > > 
> > > > But we should note that "foo=[0|1]" is superior to "foo" and "nofoo". 
> > > > Even if we didn't initially intend to add "nofoo".
> > > > 
> > > I see.
> > > 
> > > Michal-san, could you update your patch to use "swapaccount=[1|0]" ?
> > 
> > I have noticed that Andrew has already taken the last version of the
> > patch for -mm tree. Should I still rework it to change swapaccount to
> > swapaccount=0|1 resp. true|false?
> > 
> It's usual to update a patch into more sophisticated one while it is in -mm tree.
> So, I think you'd better to do it(btw, I prefer 0|1 to true|false.
> Reading kernel-parameters.txt, 0|1 is more commonly used.).
> 

I vote for 0|1

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/