Re: [BISECTED] Suspend regression in v2.6.31 with Lenovo 3000 v200

From: Alan Stern
Date: Tue Jun 22 2010 - 10:49:37 EST


On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Ozan [utf-8] Ã?aÄ?layan wrote:

> Here's the debugged dmesg output. The second dmesg output is quiet similar to this, it's port 5
> which causes the suspend to fail. I'll try to give you more details in case you want,

> [ 2.450062] usb 2-5: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 3
> [ 2.502338] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: port 5 high speed
> [ 2.502351] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: GetStatus port 5 status 001005 POWER sig=se0 PE CONNECT
> [ 2.572163] usb 2-5: default language 0x0409
> [ 2.573479] usb 2-5: udev 3, busnum 2, minor = 130
> [ 2.573487] usb 2-5: New USB device found, idVendor=0402, idProduct=5602
> [ 2.573493] usb 2-5: New USB device strings: Mfr=0, Product=1, SerialNumber=0
> [ 2.573499] usb 2-5: Product: USB2.0 Camera
> [ 2.573631] usb 2-5: uevent
> [ 2.573662] usb 2-5: usb_probe_device
> [ 2.573669] usb 2-5: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> [ 2.573759] usb 2-5: adding 2-5:1.0 (config #1, interface 0)

> [ 9.838986] ALi m5602 2-5:1.0: usb_probe_interface
> [ 9.838989] ALi m5602 2-5:1.0: usb_probe_interface - got id
> [ 9.838992] gspca: probing 0402:5602
> [ 9.838995] ALi m5602: Probing for a po1030 sensor
> [ 9.852853] ALi m5602: Probing for a mt9m111 sensor
> [ 9.869979] ALi m5602: Probing for a s5k4aa sensor
> [ 9.897729] ALi m5602: Detected a s5k4aa sensor

> [ 80.547050] usb usb2: bus suspend
> [ 80.547051] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: suspend root hub
> [ 80.547053] ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: suspend failed because port 5 is resuming
> [ 80.547055] usb usb2: bus suspend fail, err -16

Okay, the bus is usb2, the device attached to port 5 is a USB camera,
and it uses the Ali m5602 driver. I have seen similar reports before,
but they involved a webcam using the uvcvideo driver.

Anyway, the problem is that the camera sends a wakeup request, which
causes the suspend to be aborted. I can't imagine why a camera would
want to send a wakeup request -- probably it's a bug in the firmware.
You can work around it by manually (or in a udev script) disabling
wakeup on the camera:

echo disabled >/sys/bus/usb/devices/2-5/power/wakeup

Or you can back-port the patch that fixed the problem, commit
7aba8d014341341590ecb64050b7a026642a62eb (USB: don't enable remote
wakeup by default).

Alan Stern


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/