Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Tue Jun 22 2010 - 07:14:33 EST


Hi!

(ok, so I'm little late to the party).

> > Nonsense, if we want to push the system into suspend from the idle
> > state we can do that. It's just not implemented and we've never tried
> > to do it as it requires a non trivial amount of work, but I have done
> > it on an ARM two years ago as a prove of concept and it works like a
> > charm.
>
> ACPI provides no guarantees about what level of hardware functionality
> remains during S3. You don't have any useful ability to determine which
> events will generate wakeups. And from a purely practical point of view,

We'll need ACPI extensions, then (or very conservative
drivers). suspend blockers do *not* help here.

> since the latency is in the range of seconds, you'll never have a low
> enough wakeup rate to hit it.

I did 'sleepy linux' prototype on PC, and yes I was able to get to
'once in 5 seconds' wakeup rate... good enough...
Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/